* Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
> >> >> (1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
> >> >> per second.
> >> >
> >> > Please use the customary changelog style we use in the kernel:
> >> >
> >> > " Current code does (A), this has a problem when (B).
> >> > We can improve this doing (C), because (D)."
> >>
> >> A is explained, B is empty, C is explained, D is because it makes sense.
So one problem with your changelog is that you describe the change but
don't explain a couple of things - for example why you changed '3600' to
'1000'.
I know why you did it because I've read the diff and the related code, but
such kind of information is best put into changelogs.
This is standard review feedback.
> >
> > NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
>
> Suit yourself, stay with your buggy code then.
I NAK-ed your patch because your patch has several technical problems. To
lift the NAK you'll need to address my review feedback constructively.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
