On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > I understand, but why not solving that from the workqueue affinity? We want to > solve the issue of unbound workqueues in CPU isolation anyway.
Sure if you can solve that with an unbound work queue then this patch is not needed. Do you have a patch that addresses this issue in your patchset? How far out is the merging of that patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
