On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:30:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:58:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > >> But the 'cumulative' (btw, I feel a bit hard to type this word..) is > > >> different in that it *generates* entries didn't get sampled originally. > > >> And as it requires callchains, total field will not work if callchains > > >> are missing. > > > > > > Well, 'total' should disappear if it's not available. > > > > But what if it's the only sort key user gave? > > Do you mean something like: > > -F self,name -s total > > i.e. if a sort key not displayed? > > I think sort keys should be automatically added to the displayed fields > list. > > This rule is obviously met with the -F total:2,self:1,name:0 kind of > sorting syntax (you can only sort by fields that get displayed) - if mixed > with -s then it should be implicit I think.
I'm not sure why you want to add a new -F that adds news way to display fields. Isn't -s enough for that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
