Em Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:23:32AM +0100, David Ahern escreveu: > On 10/24/13 10:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >Bah, checking that again, there don't seem to be a bug there. Actually > >the sample buffer is reset after we pick the last entry. So it looks > >all fine. I got confused as usual. Nevermind. > > Ok. I had not come back to this thread since I decided on a > different route for the event copying. I'll take it out of my to-do > list.
Can you elaborate on that? I had this feeling that perhaps we could defer copying the event till it would be overwritten, something like making a range read only and then when the event would be _really_ consumed the tooling would mark it as so... Have to think about it more tho :-\ - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
