Consider this fixed. I have extracted the common function and the new
shmem_insert_page_page_cache function looks like this:
spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
error = __add_to_page_cache_locked(page, mapping, index);
if (!error)
__mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_SHMEM, nr);
radix_tree_preload_end();
spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
if (error)
page_cache_release(page);
return error;
Best wishes,
--
Ning Qu (曲宁) | Software Engineer | qun...@google.com | +1-408-418-6066
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ning Qu <qun...@google.com> wrote:
> Yes, I guess I can if I just put whatever inside the spin lock into a
> common function. Thanks!
> Best wishes,
> --
> Ning Qu (曲宁) | Software Engineer | qun...@google.com | +1-408-418-6066
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Ning Qu wrote:
>>> Yes, I can try. The code is pretty much similar with some minor difference.
>>>
>>> One thing I can do is to move the spin lock part (together with the
>>> corresponding err handling into a common function.
>>>
>>> The only problem I can see right now is we need the following
>>> additional line for shm:
>>>
>>> __mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_SHMEM, nr);
>>>
>>> Which means we need to tell if it's coming from shm or not, is that OK
>>> to add additional parameter just for that? Or is there any other
>>> better way we can infer that information? Thanks!
>>
>> I think you can account NR_SHMEM after common code succeed, don't you?
>>
>> --
>> Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
