> >a non modular build but stuffed into their own section so you can pull them
> >out with some magic that we'd include in 'REPORTING-BUGS'
>
> In a /proc file, maybe? A single file ("/proc/authors"?
> "/proc/versions"? "/proc/brags"? "/proc/kvell"?) could present the
/proc/drivers maybe. It just needs to be a compact summry for debugging -
nothing more.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Patrick Dreker
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Greg KH
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Woodhouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Pekka Pietikainen
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ben Ford
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig Milo Rogers
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Troy Benjegerdes
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Gerhard Mack
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Pavel Machek
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ian Stirling
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Juan Quintela
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig McLean

