On 10/10/2013 06:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:35:21AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>> In current kernel wide source, for arm64, only s390 scsi drivers use
>> atomic_clear_mask(), now, s390 itself need use 'unsigned int' and
>> 'atomic_t', so need match s390's atomic_clear_mask().
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h | 13 +++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
>> index 8363644..58808fc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
>> @@ -126,16 +126,17 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *ptr, int
>> old, int new)
>> return oldval;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, unsigned long
>> *addr)
>> +static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned int mask, atomic_t *ptr)
>> {
>> - unsigned long tmp, tmp2;
>> + unsigned int tmp;
>
> Same comment here as for ARM; I think you want a signed int.
>
OK, replied in patch 2/3 for ARM.
BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
> Will
>
>
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
