> Also, in printk's, you waste run-time memory, and you bloat up the need > for the log size. Both of which are _technical_ reasons not to do it. > > Small is beuatiful. I totally agree. If you want to use Linux for a small and low cost embedded system, you can't afford loads of RAM and FLASH space. Small is the _key_ for those systems. > > Linus > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Christoph Zens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (415)-289-7765 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig Milo Rogers
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Hua Zhong
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Ian Stirling
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Holger Lubitz
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jordan Crouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Daniel Phillips
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Chris Boot
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Lang
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. szonyi calin
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Rob Landley
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Christoph Zens
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Daniel Stone
- RE: Cosmetic JFFS patch. A. Melon
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Martin Knoblauch
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Hua Zhong
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Gregory Finch
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Stuart Lynne
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Raja R Harinath
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Craig McLean
- RE: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Torrey Hoffman
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Kai Henningsen