Hi! On 10/07/2013 07:49 PM, ext Brian Norris wrote: > Are we (MTD) holding a revolutionary position against the standard > kernel libraries, which recognize [KkMmGg] prefixes, but not [kMG]i > prefixes? Should we extend memparse() to accept either form? Or would > doing so simply pollute the library and not really satisfy anyone?
I was also irritated re-inventing the wheel here, but the problem is -- millions of people out there have their startup scripts and uboot environments for phram, who expect this just to work with the next kernel upgrade... -- Best regards, Alexander Sverdlin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
