On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:56:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: SNIP
> -FEATURE_TESTS = \ > - hello \ > - stackprotector-all \ > - stackprotector \ > - volatile-register-var \ > +# > +# Note that this is not a complete list of all feature tests, just > +# those that are typically built on a fully configured system. > +# > +# [ Feature tests not mentioned here have to be built explicitly in > +# the rule that uses them - an example for that is the 'bionic' > +# feature check. ] > +# > +CORE_FEATURE_TESTS = \ > + backtrace \ > + dwarf \ > fortify-source \ > - bionic \ > - libelf \ > glibc \ > - dwarf \ > - libelf-mmap \ > - libelf-getphdrnum \ > - libunwind \ > - libaudit \ > - libslang \ > gtk2 \ > gtk2-infobar \ > + libaudit \ > + libbfd \ > + libelf \ > + libelf-getphdrnum \ > + libelf-mmap \ > + libnuma \ > libperl \ > libpython \ > libpython-version \ > - libbfd \ > + libslang \ > + libunwind \ > on-exit \ > - backtrace \ > - libnuma > + stackprotector-all \ missing stackprotector? I guess that various gcc version could support either of them or both.. so we need to check for both looks like -fstack-protector-all overloads -fstack-protector but no harm to have them both added probably ;-) jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
