On 10/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:38:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > > > As all the rcu_synchronization() methods (on non UP) are quite > > > expensive, I doubt that this optimization is worth anything. > > > > Maybe. It just annoys me, because afaik, the function that gets called > > is always static per callsite. > > Yes, very much so indeed. Worst is that we have no users of the regular > RCU and RCU_BH variants and only included them for completeness since > the general operation is just as valid for those.
And personally I think we should keep type/ops for completeness anyway, even if we do not have RCU and RCU_BH users. But perhaps we can kill RCU_SYNC and RCU_BH_SYNC enums/entries until we have a user. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
