[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds) wrote on 28.06.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > I agree the messages can be ugly. But they don't do any harm either, and > > sometimes they're useful. > > I consider them harmful when I start getting annoying patches that start > adding more and more of them. Or when there are enough boot messages that the dmesg buffer overflows. My current (2.2.19pre1 or so) system has that problem. That *is* harm caused by these messages. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Olaf Hering
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Jeff Garzik
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Riley Williams
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Alan Cox
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Woodhouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. David Woodhouse
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Kai Henningsen
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Chris Wedgwood
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Paul Mackerras
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Cort Dougan
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Paul Mackerras
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Tommy Reynolds
- Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Miquel van Smoorenburg