On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:34:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: > > Ping on the series. The two patches above (3/4 and 4/4) are generic > > while the two others are impacting ARM only. > > Is it possible to get an Ack for the generic ones? > > I'm fine with those changes.. still I'm sort of worried about > current DWARF unwind users (but not sure if there're any), > who depends on packaged libunwind compiled without > --enable-debug-frame option.
Since x86 is the only architecture using libunwind with perf at the moment, and I'd expect it to use .eh_frame for unwinding, I'm also not sure there are any existing users to worry about. > I've seen your libunwind patch to make it default, but > not sure if it was accepted.. if not, maybe we should > detect this and build that code conditionaly. It certainly defaults to "on" for ARM, but other architectures have to enable it explicitly afaict. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
