Hi Nicholas, On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:23:41 -0700 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <n...@linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 15:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:08:11 -0400 Linus Torvalds > > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > So it's been two weeks, and the merge window for 3.12 is now closed. > > > > As usual, the executive friendly graph is at > > http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-) > > > > (No merge commits counted, next-20130903 was the linux-next based on v3.11) > > > > Commits in v3.12-rc1 (relative to v3.11): 9474 (v3.11-rc11: > > 9494) > > Commits in next-20130903: 8891 (next-20130701: 8929) > > Commits with the same SHA1: 7991 ( 7670) > > Commits with the same patch_id: 472 (1) ( > > 759) > > Commits with the same subject line: 70 (1) ( 55) > > > > (1) not counting those in the lines above. > > > > So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130903: 8533 90.1% (8484 > > 89.4%) > > Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722: 941 9.9% > > (1010 10.6% > > > > So better than last time, but it would be still nice to figure out where > > the last lot came from. I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if > > someone wants them. > > > > Some breakdown of that list: > > > > Top ten first word of commit summary: > > > > 57 net > > 53 mips > > 49 drm > > 47 [scsi] > > 23 perf > > 23 nfs > > 20 cifs > > 19 nvme > > 18 vfs > > 17 arm > > > > Top ten authors: > > > > 33 Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > > 21 Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> > > 20 Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> > > 18 James Smart <james.sm...@emulex.com> > > 17 Jon Mason <jon.ma...@intel.com> > > 17 Chuck Lever <chuck.le...@oracle.com> > > 16 Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com> > > 16 Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> > > 15 Daniel Borkmann <dbork...@redhat.com> > > 14 Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com> > > I'm totally confused by these stats.. > > The target-pending/for-next pull had ~30 commits with the term 'target' > in the first word of the commit summary, and yours truly had 40 commits > merged. > > Is there a reason why these would not be showing up in the above..?
These are the lists if things that went into Linus' tree but were *not* in linux-next prior to the merge window opening. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpI2UawKHN7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
