On 09/16, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It looks a bit ugly to check ->path under helper_lock(), just add
> >
> >     if (!sub_info->path)
> >             retval = -ENOENT;
> >
> > at the start. Otherwise the code looks as if there is a subtle
> > reason to take the lock before this check.
>
> Did you mean this?
>
>       DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
>       int retval = 0;
>
> +     if (!sub_info->path) {
> +             call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);

Aah, sorry! I forgot about _freeinfo().

I still think that perhaps it makes sense to update the changelog,
but this is minor.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to