On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [CCs added]
>
> Please always send PCI-related material to linux-pci in the first place.
>
Sorry, I ran get_maintainers and it seemed to think linux-acpi was sufficient.
> The change that broke things for you was actually intentional:
>
> commit b8178f130e25c1bdac1c33e0996f1ff6e20ec08e
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> Date: Mon Apr 1 15:47:39 2013 -0600
>
> Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"
>
> This reverts commit 8c33f51df406e1a1f7fa4e9b244845b7ebd61fa6.
>
> so I think we'll need to clean up the ASMP initialization after all.
>
Crud. Reading over the revert commit, it seems like the problem boils down to
the odering of checking aspm_disabled. It seems to me that the simple fix is to
track the desire for acpi to disable aspm separately from the users desire to
disable aspm (aspm_disabled). Then we just turn the points where we check the
aspm_disabled into the appropriate or of two variables, except for
pcie_asmp_sanity_check, which remains sensitive to just the user disable option.
Or is there more to this?
Neil
> On Friday, August 23, 2013 01:19:39 PM Neil Horman wrote:
> > Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi
> > probed
> > slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed. While this isn't a big deal,
> > it did
> > uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path. Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add
> > calls
> > pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
> > pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses
> > device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
> > to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
> > devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag. Since that flag is not set
> > until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
> > slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.
> >
> > Fix is pretty simple, just defer the scan until after the osc flags have
> > been
> > set on the device. Tested by myself and it seems to work well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> > CC: Len Brown <l...@kernel.org>
> > CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@sisk.pl>
> > CC: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 5917839..a2c2661 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -437,27 +437,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device
> > *device,
> > flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
> > acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> > - */
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Scan the Root Bridge
> > - * --------------------
> > - * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> > - * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> > - * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> > - */
> > - root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> > - if (!root->bus) {
> > - dev_err(&device->dev,
> > - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > - result = -ENODEV;
> > - goto end;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
> > if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
> > flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
> > if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
> > @@ -520,6 +499,26 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device
> > *device,
> > "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> > + */
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Scan the Root Bridge
> > + * --------------------
> > + * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> > + * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> > + * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> > + */
> > + root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> > + if (!root->bus) {
> > + dev_err(&device->dev,
> > + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > + result = -ENODEV;
> > + goto end;
> > + }
> > +
> > pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(device, root->bus);
> > if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
> > device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, true);
> >
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
