Hello, Aneesh. First of all, thank you for review!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:58:20PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> writes: > > > If we alloc hugepage with avoid_reserve, we don't dequeue reserved one. > > So, we should check subpool counter when avoid_reserve. > > This patch implement it. > > Can you explain this better ? ie, if we don't have a reservation in the > area chg != 0. So why look at avoid_reserve. We don't consider avoid_reserve when chg != 0. Look at following code. + if (chg || avoid_reserve) + if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, 1)) It means that if chg != 0, we skip to check avoid_reserve. > > Also the code will become if you did > > if (!chg && avoid_reserve) > chg = 1; > > and then rest of the code will be able to handle the case. We still pass avoid_reserve to dequeue_huge_page_vma() and check avoid_reserve there, so maintaining avoid_reserve and checking it separately is better to understand a logic. And it doesn't matter at all since I eventually unify these in patch 13. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
