On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:25:02AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 11:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:25:23PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >[...]
> >>diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> >[...]
> >>@@ -897,6 +904,30 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device 
> >>*pdev)
> >[...]
> >>+                   u32 reset_udelay = 20000;
> >[...]
> >>+                   udelay(reset_udelay);
> >
> >udelay(20000) is probably not a good idea. You should probably use
> >something like usleep_range() or msleep() here. Also see:
> >
> >     Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
> 
> Thierry,
> 
> thanks for mentioning this. I clearly got distracted from ms to us
> switch due to the different reset API convention. As the delay will
> be most likely 10ms+, we should change the above to
> msleep(reset_udelay/1000) instead.

I'll just go ahead and fix this up locally.  No need to resend.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to