On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:30:30AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Thierry Reding, > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:09:56 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > +- reset-gpios: optional gpio to PERST# > > > +- reset-delay-ms: delay in ms to wait after reset de-assertion > > > > I remember some recent discussion about this, and we now have this reset > > framework, so perhaps it makes more sense to use the reset binding for > > this? Cc'ing Stephen (as part of the device tree bindings maintainers > > team) who was involved in that recent reset bindings discussion. > > I also thought about this, but the reset framework seems to be designed > for "reset controller" IPs, i.e special IPs that are controlling reset > signals. Looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt, > I'm not sure to see how this would apply to GPIO-controlled reset > signals.
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org/msg36900.html
which seems to have carried over to this at some point:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg00521.html
Some of the messages in between I can't find in any archive, sorry.
Thierry
pgpohq6W6Walv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
