Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:46:48 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> index d5fe674..0a359d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -842,21 +842,21 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + i = 0;
> for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> if (!of_device_is_available(child))
> continue;
> - pcie->nports++;
> + i++;
> }
>
> - pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pcie->nports *
> + pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, i *
> sizeof(struct mvebu_pcie_port),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pcie->ports)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - i = 0;
> for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> - struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> + struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[pcie->nports];
>
> if (!of_device_is_available(child))
> continue;
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> port->dn = child;
> spin_lock_init(&port->conf_lock);
> mvebu_sw_pci_bridge_init(port);
> - i++;
> + pcie->nports++;
> }
I think I'd prefer using 'i' in this loop, and then after the loop have
a:
pcie->nports = i;
assignment. That's nitpicking, but I don't like the fact that within
the loop 'pcie->nports' doesn't mean "Number of enabled PCIe ports",
but means "Last enabled PCIe port".
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
