On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 55 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> +#define __PERF_LE 1234 > +#define __PERF_BE 4321 > + > +#if defined(__KERNEL__) I could be wrong, but I thought files under uapi weren't supposed to contain __KERNEL__ code. Wasn't that the whole point of uapi? Also having the perf_event interface depend on endianess just seems like a complicated mess. Can't we just declare the interface to be a certain endianess and have the kernel byte-swap as necessary? Vince -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
