It's quite unlikely that dev_set_promiscuity will fail,
but worth checking just in case.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/macvlan.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
index 13937f9..d0f9c2f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
@@ -337,8 +337,11 @@ static int macvlan_open(struct net_device *dev)
        int err;
 
        if (vlan->port->passthru) {
-               if (!(vlan->flags & MACVLAN_FLAG_NOPROMISC))
-                       dev_set_promiscuity(lowerdev, 1);
+               if (!(vlan->flags & MACVLAN_FLAG_NOPROMISC)) {
+                       err = dev_set_promiscuity(lowerdev, 1);
+                       if (err < 0)
+                               goto out;
+               }
                goto hash_add;
        }
 
-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to