Yes, it's reasonable from performance view. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:38:58PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > All table based voltage list have ascendant order. > Use regulator_map_voltage_ascend for them. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c > b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c > index e9e8ae3..dbb6e1a 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = { > > static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops = { > .list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table, > + .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend, > .set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap, > .get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap, > > -- > 1.8.1.2 > > > >
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
