On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 08:49:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Long term, final goal is likely to be close to what Russell is saying
Why is this a long term goal? Start today. > -- nothing should go into the kernel tree unless the binding is in a > fully stable state. However, we have a transitional period between now > and then, and even when we're at the final state there will be need to > have some sort of sandbox for development and test of future bindings. Why not just set up a git tree right away? > Dealing with all that, as well as the actual process for locking in > bindings, is what needs to be sorted out. > > I think we're all in agreement that bindings that change over time are > nothing but pain, but we're arguing that in circles anyway. No. I keep saying, the bindings must be stable ABI, *today*. You keep saying, maybe later, but until then we will make things up as we go along. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
