On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting > established bindings change with each new kernel version. I am > opposed to that.
No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea. There is some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
