On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:16 +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> linux-3.10.1 introduced a regression in cpufreq breaking suspend/resume
> cycle for some people [1].
The upstream commit that probably will fix the regression that Kiko ran
into is aae760ed21cd690fe8a6db9f3a177ad55d7e12ab ("cpufreq: Revert
commit a66b2e to fix suspend/resume regression"). It's only part of
v3.11-rc2 and was committed with a
Cc: 3.10+ <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
tag. So I'd guess that fix will be part of a future v3.10.y (stable)
releases.
> There were also some other threads about it in lkml.
>
> I see 3.10.2-stable was released some days ago. I couldn’t see anything
> about fixing this regression reported in the changelog.
>
> And to be 110% certain, I compiled it and tried suspending/resuming;
> it’s still broken.
>
> Is this going to be fixed in 3.10 stable branch?
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
Note that I already suggested to Kiko to try that patch (see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/14/35 ). I don't know whether Kiko tried
it, as I never received a reply to my suggestion. So, for now, I can
only say that that patch will probably fix the issue.
> [1] first commit that bisect informed as introducing the regression:
>
> | commit c02527487f0c8feb578c0394ad481a97f26d3bd2
> | Author: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> | Date: Mon Jul 1 00:40:55 2013 +0200
> |
> | cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume
> |
> | commit f51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd upstream.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.kernel/LUi1pFCxbSI
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
