Hi Linus, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:57:35 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote: > > Please pull the following to get phase two of the __cpuinit removal. > > With the __cpuinit infrastructure removed earlier, this group of commits > only removes the function/data tagging that was done with the various > (now no-op) __cpuinit related prefixes. > > Now that the dust has settled with yesterday's v3.11-rc1, there hopefully > shouldn't be any new users leaking back in tree, but I think we can leave > the harmless no-op stubs there for a release as a courtesy to those who > still have out of tree stuff and weren't paying attention. > > Although the commits are against the recent tag to allow for minor context > refreshes for things like yesterday's v3.11-rc1~ slab content, the patches > have been largely unchanged for weeks, aside from such trivial updates. > > For detail junkies, the largely boring and mostly irrelevant history of > the patches can be viewed at: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/cpuinit-delete.git > > If nothing else, I guess it does at least demonstrate the level of > involvement required to shepherd such a treewide change to completion. > > This is the same repository of patches that has been applied to the > end of the daily linux-next branches for the past several weeks. > > The branch below represents a direct "git am" of the above patch repo > (that is similarly tagged with v3.11-rc1) to mainline's v3.11-rc1.
It would be good if this could go in soon as I am already seeing (so far trivial) conflicts against some of these. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpNDGzPFZM3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
