On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:20:31AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> @@ -953,37 +937,49 @@ static void acpiphp_sanitize_bus(struct
> * ACPI event handlers
> */
>
> -static acpi_status
> -check_sub_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> +static acpi_status check_sub_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *data,
> + void **rv)
> {
> - struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
> - char objname[64];
> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> - .pointer = objname };
> + struct acpiphp_context *context = acpiphp_get_context(handle);
> +
> + if (!context)
> + return AE_OK;
>
> - bridge = acpiphp_handle_to_bridge(handle);
> - if (bridge) {
> + if (context->bridge) {
> + struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge = context->bridge;
> + char objname[64];
> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> + .pointer = objname };
> +
> + get_bridge(bridge);
> acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> - dbg("%s: re-enumerating slots under %s\n",
> - __func__, objname);
> + dbg("%s: re-enumerating slots under %s\n", __func__, objname);
Although not related to this patch directly, how about using
acpi_handle_debug() or similar here?
> acpiphp_check_bridge(bridge);
> put_bridge(bridge);
> }
> + acpiphp_put_context(context);
> return AE_OK ;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
