Current implementation of RTC interface allows for system suspend to
occur in the following cases:
(a) if a timer is set in the past and rtc_timer_do_work() is scheduled
to handle it, and
(b) if rtc_timer_do_work() is called to handle expired timers whose
handlers implement a preemption point.

A pending suspend request may be honoured in the above cases causing
timer handling to be delayed until after the next resume. This is
undesirable since timer handlers may have time-critical code to execute.

This patch makes sure that the system stays awake until all expired
timers are handled.

Note that all calls to pm_stay_awake() are eventually paired with
the single pm_relax() call in rtc_timer_do_work(), which is launched
using schedule_work().

Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zu...@towertech.it>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
Cc: Arve Hjonnevag <a...@android.com>
Cc: Todd Poynor <toddpoy...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic <zoran.marko...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/interface.c |   13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
index 42bd57d..dace26e 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int rtc_set_time(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
        } else
                err = -EINVAL;
 
+       pm_stay_awake(rtc->dev.parent);
        mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
        /* A timer might have just expired */
        schedule_work(&rtc->irqwork);
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ int rtc_set_mmss(struct rtc_device *rtc, unsigned long secs)
        else
                err = -EINVAL;
 
+       pm_stay_awake(rtc->dev.parent);
        mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
        /* A timer might have just expired */
        schedule_work(&rtc->irqwork);
@@ -771,9 +773,10 @@ static int rtc_timer_enqueue(struct rtc_device *rtc, 
struct rtc_timer *timer)
                alarm.time = rtc_ktime_to_tm(timer->node.expires);
                alarm.enabled = 1;
                err = __rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alarm);
-               if (err == -ETIME)
+               if (err == -ETIME) {
+                       pm_stay_awake(rtc->dev.parent);
                        schedule_work(&rtc->irqwork);
-               else if (err) {
+               } else if (err) {
                        timerqueue_del(&rtc->timerqueue, &timer->node);
                        timer->enabled = 0;
                        return err;
@@ -818,8 +821,10 @@ static void rtc_timer_remove(struct rtc_device *rtc, 
struct rtc_timer *timer)
                alarm.time = rtc_ktime_to_tm(next->expires);
                alarm.enabled = 1;
                err = __rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alarm);
-               if (err == -ETIME)
+               if (err == -ETIME) {
+                       pm_stay_awake(rtc->dev.parent);
                        schedule_work(&rtc->irqwork);
+               }
        }
 }
 
@@ -845,7 +850,6 @@ void rtc_timer_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
        mutex_lock(&rtc->ops_lock);
 again:
-       pm_relax(rtc->dev.parent);
        __rtc_read_time(rtc, &tm);
        now = rtc_tm_to_ktime(tm);
        while ((next = timerqueue_getnext(&rtc->timerqueue))) {
@@ -880,6 +884,7 @@ again:
        } else
                rtc_alarm_disable(rtc);
 
+       pm_relax(rtc->dev.parent);
        mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to