On Sun, 20 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On 20 May 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
> > > Also in all recent kernels, if the machine is swapping, swap cache
> > > grows without limits and is hard to recycle, but then again that is
> > > a known problem.
> >
> > This one bugs me. I do not see that and can't understand why.
>
> Could it be because we never free swap space and never
> delete pages from the swap cache ?
I sent a query to the list asking if a heavy load cleared it out,
but got no replies. I figured about the only thing it could be
is that under light load, reclaim isn't needed to cure and shortage.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Zlatko Calusic
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Matti Aarnio
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Matti Aarnio
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Ingo Oeser
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 J . A . Magallon
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Jeff Garzik

