On Sun, 20 May 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Also in all recent kernels, if the machine is swapping, swap cache > > grows without limits and is hard to recycle, but then again that is > > a known problem. > > This one bugs me. I do not see that and can't understand why. To throw away dirty and dead swapcache (its done at swap writepage()) pages page_launder() has to run into its second loop (launder_loop = 1) (meaning that a lot of clean cache has been thrown out already). We can "short circuit" this dead swapcache pages by cleaning them in the first page_launder() loop. Take a look at the writepage() patch I sent to Linus a few days ago. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Zlatko Calusic
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Matti Aarnio
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Matti Aarnio
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Ingo Oeser