On 06/20/13 20:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 14:34 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:28 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:

Reading the whole text with your remark in mind, I guess it does
indicate there are no guarantees depending on the kernel and the list of
operators are what trace-cmd supports. I overlooked/ignored the text
seeing the operators.

Exactly, which means that if you over looked the text, so has others.
The text
should be changed to make it more comprehensible.


Would this change have helped you catch this?

Always difficult to say in retrospect, but it certainly is more clear.

Regards,
Arend

diff --git a/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt 
b/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
index b95e1b4..9ef1e2a 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
+++ b/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
@@ -79,10 +79,12 @@ OPTIONS
      let you use C notation to check if an event should be processed or not.

  ----------------------------------------
-    ==,>=,<=,>,<,&, |,&&  and ||
+    ==,>=,<=,>,<,&, ~,&&  and ||
  ----------------------------------------

-    The above are usually safe to use to compare fields.
+    Note, not all of the above operators may work with all kernels.
+    The filter is passed directly to the kernel and is dependent on the
+    kernel supporting the operators.

  *-v*::
      This will cause all events specified after it on the command line to not

-- Steve




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to