On 06/15/2013 02:16 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 21:56:05 schrieb Linus Walleij:
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Laurent Pinchart
>>
>> <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>>> mmcif_pins: mmcif {
>>>
>>> mux {
>>>
>>> renesas,groups = "mmc0_data8_0", "mmc0_ctrl_0";
>>> renesas,function = "mmc0";
>>>
>>> };
>>> cfg {
>>>
>>> renesas,groups = "mmc0_data8_0";
>>> renesas,pins = "PORT279";
>>> bias-pull-up = <1>;
>>
>> If I understood your code correctly that last statement can *optionally*
>> be written like just:
>>
>> bias-pull-up;
>>
>> Without the parameter?
>>
>> I think that Heiko's implementation does this anyway.
>
> Yep, with the fixes-series from yesterday the bias-pull-* now have a better
> default value of <1>.
>
> so you can do
> bias-pull-up;
> which is then identical to the
> bias-pull-up = <1>;
> above (both are valid of course).
A property with a value is an integer. One without is a Boolean. The
same property shouldn't be both.
Regarding the value representing resistance: That feels pretty odd.
Enabling a pullup and selecting the pullup resistance feel like
orthogonal options which shouldn't be bound to each-other.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
