On Wednesday 19 June 2013 12:58:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote:
> > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code
> > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <h...@sgi.com>
> > To: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Russ Anderson <r...@sgi.com>
> > Cc: Robin Holt <h...@sgi.com>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
> > Cc: Guan Xuetao <g...@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>
> > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree?
>
> I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added
> using the old interface.
Hmm, I realized after sending it that this patch depends on
at least one other patch to add the 'enum'. Any suggestions
for how to handle that?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
