On 06/11/13 15:28, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2013-06-04 12:25:38)
>> Move the existing clock code in mach-msm to the common clock
>> framework. We lose our capability to set the rate of and enable a
>> clock through debugfs. This is ok though because the debugfs
>> features are mainly used for testing and development of new clock
>> code.
>>
>> To maintain compatibility with the original MSM clock code we
>> make a wrapper for clk_reset() that calls the struct msm_clk
>> specific reset function. This is necessary for the usb and sdcc
>> devices on MSM until a better suited API is made available.
>>
>> Cc: Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
> I just went through this quickly and nothing popped out at me.  Nice
> diffstat btw!  Do you have any plans to move this to drivers/clk/msm ?
>
> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org>

Thanks Mike.

I plan to add mmio support under drivers/clk/msm. Moving this proc_comm
based code to drivers/clk/msm is possible but it would need to depend on
the 3 architectures that use it so that it isn't available or compiled
on our DT based platforms. We can do that later I suppose.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to