Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-06-04 12:08:08) > On 06/04/2013 12:57 PM, Jay Agarwal wrote: > > Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock > > as tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock api > > gives warning and ultimately does not succeed to assert(deassert). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jay Agarwal <jagar...@nvidia.com> > > --- > > Patch is based on remotes/gitorious_thierryreding_linux/tegra/next and > > should be applied on top of this. > > For this change, Mike may as well apply it directly to the clock tree. > Thierry can then pick it up when he rebases his tegra/next tree. > > That said, I don't think you should need any of the > TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries; the PCIe driver should get its clocks > from device tree now, and hence the driver name in the clock > registration shouldn't be necessary. All of these TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() > entries should be removed en mass sometime soon with luck. So, can you > simply leave the two TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries untouched, rather > than changing them?
Ping on this patch. I can take it through my tree, but is there going to be rework based on Stephen's comments? Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
