Hi yinghai, HPA,

On 04/12/2013 08:55 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
Now we have arch_pfn_mapped array, and max_low_pfn_mapped should not
be used anymore.

I'm rebasing this patch-set to the latest kernel, and improving the
comment. But I didn't find any "arch_pfn_mapped array" in the kernel.

Would you please tell me what "arch_pfn_mapped array" is ?

Is it the "struct range pfn_mapped[E820_X_MAX];" in arch/x86/mm/init.c ?

Thanks. :)


User should use arch_pfn_mapped or just 1UL<<(32-PAGE_SHIFT) instead.

Only user is ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE, and it should not use that,
as later accessing is using early_ioremap(). We could change to use
1U<<(32_PAGE_SHIFT) with it, aka under 4G.

-v2: Leave alone max_low_pfn_mapped in i915 code according to tj.

Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin<h...@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<ying...@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"<r...@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jacob Shin<jacob.s...@amd.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg<penb...@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Thomas Renninger<tr...@suse.de>
---
  arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h | 1 -
  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c           | 4 +---
  arch/x86/mm/init.c                | 4 ----
  drivers/acpi/osl.c                | 6 +++---
  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
index 54c9787..b012b82 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@

  extern int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pagenr);

-extern unsigned long max_low_pfn_mapped;
  extern unsigned long max_pfn_mapped;

  static inline phys_addr_t get_max_mapped(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 1629577..e75c6e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -113,13 +113,11 @@
  #include<asm/prom.h>

  /*
- * max_low_pfn_mapped: highest direct mapped pfn under 4GB
- * max_pfn_mapped:     highest direct mapped pfn over 4GB
+ * max_pfn_mapped:     highest direct mapped pfn
   *
   * The direct mapping only covers E820_RAM regions, so the ranges and gaps are
   * represented by pfn_mapped
   */
-unsigned long max_low_pfn_mapped;
  unsigned long max_pfn_mapped;

  #ifdef CONFIG_DMI
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 59b7fc4..abcc241 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -313,10 +313,6 @@ static void add_pfn_range_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, 
unsigned long end_pfn)
        nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX);

        max_pfn_mapped = max(max_pfn_mapped, end_pfn);
-
-       if (start_pfn<  (1UL<<(32-PAGE_SHIFT)))
-               max_low_pfn_mapped = max(max_low_pfn_mapped,
-                                        min(end_pfn, 1UL<<(32-PAGE_SHIFT)));
  }

  bool pfn_range_is_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 586e7e9..313d14d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -624,9 +624,9 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
        if (table_nr == 0)
                return;

-       acpi_tables_addr =
-               memblock_find_in_range(0, max_low_pfn_mapped<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
-                                      all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);
+       /* under 4G at first, then above 4G */
+       acpi_tables_addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, (1ULL<<32) - 1,
+                                       all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);
        if (!acpi_tables_addr) {
                WARN_ON(1);
                return;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to