On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > Abstract device file systems are beautiful concepts but they don't solve > the device name space problem and they introduce hideous incompatibilities > with existing software. let me get it straight. You are talking about software that would be a) device-specific, b) Linux-only, c) working with devices that do not exist in 2.4. Would you mind demonstrating such wonder? Old devices are still there, AFAICS. Ext2 (reiserfs, devfs, abortion-of-your-choice-fs) still has the ability to create device nodes for them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Jens Axboe
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Neil Brown
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants John Fremlin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Rik van Riel
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Andi Kleen
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Richard Gooch
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Richard Gooch
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants God