On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:29:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Big device numbers are _not_ a solution. I will accept a 32-bit one, but > no more, and I will _not_ accept a "manage by hand" approach any more. The > time has long since come to say "No". Which I've done. If you can't make > it manage the thing automatically with a script, you won't get a hardcoded > major device number just because you're lazy. As far as I can see it just needs a /proc/devices that also outputs minor ranges with names, and a small program similar to scsidev to generate nodes in /dev based on that on the fly on early bootup. Is that what you have in mind? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Neil Brown
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Linus Torvalds
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Daniel Phillips
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Jens Axboe
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Neil Brown
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants John Fremlin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Rik van Riel
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Andi Kleen
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Richard Gooch
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox