On 05/31/2013 03:13 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
On 04/30/2013 05:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Here's the patch to make sched_clock generic. I didn't know
where to put it so I just made a new file in kernel/sched
for now.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
Hey Stephen,
     Baruch just asked a question about moving arm's sched_clock.c to
be generic, and it sounded familiar, so I dug around and found this
mail from a few months ago.

Just wanted to follow up and see what the status is with this? Is
this queued somewhere already?

As far as I know nothing has been queued. I refreshed the
patchset against 3.10-rc2 but haven't sent it out since it wasn't
clear if anyone wanted it. Shall I send it again?

Please. Even if it need an eventual deeper rework to be totally generic, I think we need to start moving things in that generic direction. Baruch's case is a clear example where non-arm code could share it, so I think that's at least a good proof point that sharing is actually needed (rather then just for theoretical reasons).

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to