On Thu, 09 May 2013 20:53:06 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com> wrote:
> get_tree() in audit_add_tree_rule() is needed (my original conclusion is > incorrect). OK.. > But we need let 'rule->tree = NULL;' firstly, so can protect rule itself > freed in kill_rules(). I'll believe you ;) I turned this into a proper patch and added your (missed) Signed-off-by:. > For me, after 'rule->tree = NULL', all things seems fine !! Well, what was wrong before? Is there some user-triggerable misbehaviour which you observed? If so, please describe it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
