On 5/7/13 12:29 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> wrote:

This is a good fix. I have run into this infinite loop in perf report
many times.

Hm, perf record should really not assume much about the perf.data and
should avoid infinite loops ...

So while making perf.data more consistent on SIGTERM is a nice fix, perf
report should be fixed as well to detect loops and such.

Thanks,

        Ingo


This seems to do the trick:

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index 326068a..e82646f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -2802,6 +2802,17 @@ int perf_session__read_header(struct perf_session *session, int fd)
    if (perf_file_header__read(&f_header, header, fd) < 0)
        return -EINVAL;

+   /*
+    * sanity check that perf.data was written cleanly: data size
+    * is initialized to 0 and updated only if the on_exit function
+    * is run. If data size is still 0 then the file cannot be
+    * processed.
+    */
+   if (f_header.data.size == 0) {
+       pr_err("data size is 0. Was record properly terminated?\n");
+       return -1;
+   }
+
    nr_attrs = f_header.attrs.size / f_header.attr_size;
    lseek(fd, f_header.attrs.offset, SEEK_SET);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to