On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:47:47PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > - removed some mb's for non-SMP This isn't correct. Either you need atomic updates or you don't. If you don't, then you shouldn't be using ll/sc at all. If you do (perhaps to coordinate with devices) then the barriers are required. > - removed non-inline up()/down_xx() when semaphore/waitqueue debugging > isn't enabled. They should still be exported for module compatibility. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimiza... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores opti... Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization David Howells
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimiza... Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] 2.4.4 alpha semaphores optimization Ivan Kokshaysky
- __builtin_expect vs inlining Richard Henderson