>
> Have you been writing to EEPROMS? Their erase/write cycle might be
> longer. But I am not forcing you to change the value, just giving some
> suggestions.
My board has i2c mux, temp sensor, eeprom. And I added some debugging code for
measuring i2c response time as below and
run i2c operation for each device.
The maximum respeonse time was 500usec(under 1msec). So 20 msec is enough for
adapter timeout.
Thanks.
static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
{
int result;
+ struct timeval start, end;
octeon_i2c_int_enable(i2c);
+ do_gettimeofday(&start);
result = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue,
octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c),
i2c->adap.timeout);
+ do_gettimeofday(&end);
+ if(end.tv_usec < start.tv_usec){
+ end.tv_usec += 1000000;
+ end.tv_sec--;
+ }
+ if(result > 0)
+ printk("octeon_i2c_wait elapse time: %ld msecs\n", (end.tv_sec
- start.tv_sec)*1000000 + (end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec));
+ else
+ printk("octeon_i2c_wait fail!!\n");
}N떑꿩�r툤y鉉싕b쾊Ф푤v�^�)頻{.n�+돴쪐{콗喩zX㎍썳變}찠꼿쟺�&j:+v돣�쳭喩zZ+�+zf＂톒쉱�~넮녬i鎬z� 췿ⅱ�?솳鈺�&�)刪f뷌^j푹y쬶끷@A첺뛴
0띠h��뭝
