Hello, Li. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:05PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > I think this was introduced unintentionally when cpuset hotplug was > made asynchronous. Fortunately it does no harm, as updating tasks' > cpumask will just return failure and there's a guarantee_online_mems() > when updating nodemask, and then the tasks will be moved to an ancestor > cpuset.
Yeah, which will update the masks to the proper values anyway, so it was intentionally written that way as it didn't really matter either way. I suppose this helps future changes? Maybe update the description a bit? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
