On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
 :
> >
> >> +static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
> >> +{
> >> +  struct resource *res = NULL;
> >> +
> >> +  spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >> +  if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
> >> +          res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
> >> +          bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> >> +          memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> >> +  }
> >> +  spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >
> 
> > I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.
> >
> > spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > if (..) {
> >     :
> >     spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >     memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> > } else {
> >     spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >     res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
> > }
> 
> Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?
> 
> spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
>       res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
>       bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> }
> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> 
> if (res)
>       memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> else  
>       res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
-Toshi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to