On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:28 -0700 Cody P Schafer <c...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> "Problems" with the current code: > 1. there is a lack of synchronization in setting ->high and ->batch in > percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler() > 2. stop_machine() in zone_pcp_update() is unnecissary. > 3. zone_pcp_update() does not consider the case where > percpu_pagelist_fraction is non-zero > > To fix: > 1. add memory barriers, a safe ->batch value, an update side mutex when > updating ->high and ->batch, and use ACCESS_ONCE() for ->batch users that > expect a stable value. > 2. avoid draining pages in zone_pcp_update(), rely upon the memory barriers > added to fix #1 > 3. factor out quite a few functions, and then call the appropriate one. > > Note that it results in a change to the behavior of zone_pcp_update(), which > is > used by memory_hotplug. I'm rather certain that I've diserned (and preserved) > the essential behavior (changing ->high and ->batch), and only eliminated > unneeded actions (draining the per cpu pages), but this may not be the case. > > Further note that the draining of pages that previously took place in > zone_pcp_update() occured after repeated draining when attempting to offline a > page, and after the offline has "succeeded". It appears that the draining was > added to zone_pcp_update() to avoid refactoring setup_pageset() into 2 > funtions. There hasn't been a ton of review activity for this patchset :( I'm inclined to duck it until after 3.9. Do the patches fix any noticeably bad userspace behavior? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
