On 04/05/2013 11:45 AM, Ric Mason wrote:
Hi Kirill,
On 03/15/2013 01:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
Returns true if mapping can have huge pages. Just check for __GFP_COMP
in gfp mask of the mapping for now.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index e3dea75..3521b0d 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -84,6 +84,16 @@ static inline void mapping_set_gfp_mask(struct
address_space *m, gfp_t mask)
(__force unsigned long)mask;
}
+static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space
*m)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
+ gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
+ return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
I always see !! in kernel, but why check directly instead of have !!
prefix?
s/why/why not
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* The page cache can done in larger chunks than
* one page, because it allows for more efficient
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
