Hi Chanwoo, On 28 March 2013 04:51, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 03/27/2013 08:23 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> Return the value obtained from the function instead of hardcoding. >> Silences the following warning: >> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c:297 max77693_muic_set_path() >> info: why not propagate 'ret' from max77693_update_reg() instead of (-11)? >> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c:310 max77693_muic_set_path() >> info: why not propagate 'ret' from max77693_update_reg() instead of (-11)? >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> [snip]
>> dev_info(info->dev, > As my comment about "extcon: max8997: Fix return value", > I wish to receive one patch which modify all of return value with 'ret' > in extcon-max77693.c. Resent both patches as per your suggestion. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
