"clock-latency" is incorrectly written as "transition-latency" in an example
present in Documentation of cpufreq-cpu0. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
index 4416ccc..051f764 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ cpus {
396000 950000
198000 850000
>;
- transition-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+ clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
};
cpu@1 {
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
